jim ross
(Photo by Paul Redmond/WireImage)

Does Jim Ross Agree with WWE’s Stance on Not Drug Testing Part-Time Performers?, More From JR on Brock Lesnar’s UFC Drug Test Failures

jim ross

A new Jim Ross blog has been posted over at JRsBarBQ.com, and below are his thoughts on WWE not suspending Brock Lesnar for his UFC anti-doping violations because Lesnar is exempt from the WWE Wellness Policy:

“All the armchair attorneys calling for WWE to suspend Brock Lesnar for his failed USADA drug tests associated with UFC 200 need to review Lesnar’s contract and the WWE Wellness policy.  Lesnar is a part time talent and part timers are not under the standard, WWE wellness policy according to the WWE itself. If Shaq actually does get in the ring with Big Show at WM33 in Orlando, then Shaq would not be tested either because he would be considered a part timer.

Read Also: Eric Bischoff Surprised Brock Lesnar is Exempt From WWE’s Wellness Policy

Lesnar is a part-time talent and part-timers are not under the standard, WWE wellness policy according to the WWE itself. If Shaq actually does get in the ring with Big Show at WM33 in Orlando, then Shaq would not be tested either because he would be considered a part-timer. I am not condoning PED use in any way but I do agree that WWE cannot require part time performers in a show business presentation, not a legit sport, to adhere to the same rules and regulations that they require of their full-time talents. Plus to compare pro wrestling to MMA is somewhat eye-rolling.”

TRENDING