This segment is debating which match is being hyped up better— Dean Ambrose vs Brock Lesnar or Shane McMahon vs Undertaker. Here’s some highlights of the conversation:
Josh Isenberg:
Longevity is reason I’m more entertained by Shane vs Undertaker. I think that’s going to change. A lot of history they could be doing and they’re not and that’s bothersome with the lackluster roster. Do the most you can with the history of The Undertaker and McMahon’s.
Brian Gulish:
Dean Ambrose versus Brock Lesnar—I’m excited. There’s potential. The part Dean Ambrose plays of I’m crazy, I’m not scared, I’lm going to play mind games. I like the build. I don’t think we’ve seen a tip of the iceberg with Shane versus Undertaker for the fact thee will be so many matches and WWE is holding them out. You have Austin, Michaels, The Rock and so many others who could come into play.
Justin LaBar:
I’m much more excited and impressed with Ambrose versus Lesnar and that makes me mad. I want to be more excited about the uniqueness of Shane versus Undertaker in Hell in a Cell with power on the line and I feel like they aren’t diving in as much as they could. But with Ambrose versus Lesnar, I literally and getting antsy and excited for this is going to be a car wreck. I mean this in the most beautiful way. I like the build because I’m really starting to believe that Dean Ambrose has more of a chance than when this started.
To see the full debate, watch the video below:
